Mixed Feelings on the Outlook of the Construction Industry?
There has been much speculation recently about whether or not the economy is heading for another recession, and if so, when it will occur. Since the last ...
" />
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) were developed with the purpose of benefiting the various stakeholders of a business (e.g., creditors and shareholders) by ensuring that the same financial reporting methods are used consistently by all companies. For example, GAAP financial statements would help a bank determine a business’s ability to make interest and principal payments on a loan. GAAP are always being updated to help financial statement readers better understand the financial condition of businesses.
However, the value of an asset listed on a balance sheet prepared in accordance with GAAP might be much different from the fair market value of that asset.1 The three examples below describe situations when the fair market value of an asset might be much different than its GAAP, or book, value.
Consider a company with valuable internally developed trademarks, patents and other intellectual property (“IP”) that have been developed and supported over many years through research, development and advertising. The IP allows the company to enjoy strong market share and earnings margins compared to its competitors. However, when preparing the company’s financial statements in accordance with GAAP, any expenses associated with developing this IP would be expensed in the period incurred, and would thus not be recorded on the balance sheet. Under GAAP, IP assets would only be recorded on the balance sheet when they are acquired from a third party, as opposed to being created internally. Internally developed IP assets can often represent a large portion of a business’s total value, but a GAAP balance sheet would miss this important piece of a business’s “value puzzle.”
Financial statements should be prepared in accordance with GAAP so that stakeholders can consistently understand the financial condition of all businesses. All of the GAAP rules mentioned in the examples above were developed to serve various important reasons. However, when determining the fair market value of a business, it is important to recognize that there might be some differences between book/GAAP value and the fair market value of assets. In addition to considering the balance sheet, a valuation analyst considers various other factors and techniques (e.g., discounted cash flow analyses, market multiple analyses, etc.) when estimating the value of a business.
Schneider Downs has significant experience preparing business valuations for a wide range of purposes. Please contact Steve Thimons (412-697-5281; sthimons@sdcpa.com) or Joel Rosenthal (412-697-5387; jrosenthal@sdcpa.com) to ask a question or discuss Schneider Downs’ various business valuation services.
1The definition of “fair market value” is beyond the scope of this article. Used in this context, “fair market value” is intended to represent the price that an asset could be sold for on the present date.
There has been much speculation recently about whether or not the economy is heading for another recession, and if so, when it will occur. Since the last ...
The general rule under Internal Revenue Code §451 is that an item of income shall be included in gross income for the taxable year or receipt unless ...
We’d love to hear from you. Drop us a note, and we’ll respond to you as quickly as possible.
Ask us
One PPG Place, Suite 1700
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
contactsd@schneiderdowns.com
p:412.261.3644
f:412.261.4876
65 East State Street, Suite 2000
Columbus, OH 43215
contactsd@schneiderdowns.com
p:614.621.4060
f:614.621.4062
1660 International Drive, Suite 600
McLean, VA 22102
contactsd@schneiderdowns.com
p:571.380.9003