A Deeper Look at the ACFE’s 2020 Report to the Nations

Each year, the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (“ACFE”) publishes the Report to the Nations, where it presents its findings related to occupational fraud and abuse. As defined in the report, occupational fraud is fraud committed by individuals against the organizations that employ them. In short, it is an attack from within.

The ACFE’s 2020 study on occupational fraud and abuse was the 11th study since 1996. The 2020 study encompassed 2,504 cases (investigated between January 2018 and September 2019) from 125 countries, representing over $3.6 billion in losses.

Back in April, we discussed some of the highlights from the study. This article will take a deeper dive into some of its findings.

Types of Fraud

The three major types of occupational fraud are asset misappropriation, corruption and financial statement fraud. 

Asset misappropriation is the most common form of occupational fraud, in terms of frequency, representing 86% of cases in the ACFE’s study. However, the median loss related to asset misappropriation cases was only $100,000, which is significantly less than the other two types.

Corruption schemes fell in the middle, representing 38% of cases and a median loss of $250,000. However, corruption was identified as the most common scheme in every global region.

Financial statement fraud was seen in only 10% of the cases investigated; however, it was certainly the most expensive type of fraud with a reported median loss of $945,000.

Detection and Controls

Detection of fraud is a vital component of fraud prevention. The more proactive an organization is with identifying and addressing fraud, the more control employers have over their employees’ perception that fraud will be detected. This may help to deter wrongdoing going forward.

The ACFE’s study found that organizations with formal reporting mechanisms and fraud awareness training for their employees were more likely to receive tips from their employees. Of the 43% of fraud schemes that were uncovered via tip, half of those tips were reported by an employee. Further, the study found that organizations without whistleblower hotlines had median losses of $198,000, which was almost double the losses of organizations with hotlines.

Over the last decade, organizations have worked to increase the use of targeted anti-fraud controls. The use of hotlines and anti-fraud policies has increased by 13%. Anti-fraud controls reduce the magnitude of losses and increase the speed of detection. The ACFE estimates that a lack of internal controls contributed to almost one-third of the fraud cases studied.

Who Are the Fraudsters?

Common characteristics and risk profiles of those who commit occupational fraud were identified in the study. The perpetrator’s level of authority and the length of tenure were key factors in the size of the fraud. While executives accounted for only 20% of the frauds studied, their frauds had a median loss of $600,000. The correlation with authority and size of fraud has been proven time and time again by these annual studies. Additionally, the longer the perpetrator worked for the particular organization, the greater the damages. Fraudsters with a tenure of at least ten years stole a median of $200,000, four times larger than perpetrators with less than a year of tenure at their victim organization.

Our team has investigated numerous frauds or allegations of fraud involving asset misappropriation, corruption and financial statement fraud.  Our experience is consistent with the results indicated in the study regarding controls, tips, hotlines and who commits fraud.  Also, we often see an overlap in types of fraud – such as asset misappropriations and financial statement fraud – false financial statements prepared in an effort to cover the misappropriation.

Should you identify fraud, or have concerns of fraud occurring in your organization, contact Joel Rosenthal at 412.697.5387 or jrosenthal@sdcpa.com or Alyssa Brunatti at 412.697.5371 or abrunatti@sdcpa.com to see how we can help you address those risks.

You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours

The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at contactSD@schneiderdowns.com.

Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.

© 2020 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

our thoughts on

COVID-19: The Long Road to Recovery
Could your PPP loan affect the sale of your business?
Schneider Downs’ Construction Practice Ranked Once Again
Paycheck Protection Program – Treatment of Owners and Forgiveness of Certain Nonpayroll Costs
District Court Dismissal in Lee v. Argent Trust Company Upheld in Appeals Court
Using Text Mining Sentiment Analysis to Detect Fraud: An Enron Email Case Study

Register to receive our weekly newsletter with our most recent columns and insights.

Have a question? Ask us!

We’d love to hear from you. Drop us a note, and we’ll respond to you as quickly as possible.

Ask us

contact us

Map of Pittsburgh Office

One PPG Place, Suite 1700
Pittsburgh, PA 15222

p:412.261.3644     f:412.261.4876

Map of Columbus Office

65 East State Street, Suite 2000
Columbus, OH 43215

p:614.621.4060     f:614.621.4062

Map of Washington Office
Washington, D.C.

1660 International Drive, Suite 600
McLean, VA 22102