Revenue Recognition- Member Owned Private Organization

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), providing a robust framework for addressing revenue recognition issues and, upon its effective date, replacing almost all pre-existing revenue recognition guidance. Implementation of the framework provided in the ASU should result in improved comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions and capital markets.

The new guidance applies specifically to contracts with customers and will impact how member-owned private organizations account for revenue. Since such organizations typically have multiple revenue streams, each one will need to be evaluated during the adoption period.

ASU 2014-09 defines a customer as “a party that has contracted with an entity to obtain goods or services that are an output of the entity’s ordinary activities in exchange for consideration” (ASC 606-10-15-3). This raises a question for member-owned private organizations as to whether a selected transaction involves a member acting as a customer (e.g., purchasing food from a clubhouse) or as an owner, when contributing to a capital assessment, for example. Since organizations typically have more than one form of membership, each offering different rights and benefits, they are now required to individually evaluate their categories and decide whether each obtains an ownership interest or only a privilege.

When evaluating those revenue streams, the majority of transactions are expected to meet the definition of “revenue from a customer” and should not significantly change the way revenue is currently recognized. There are, however, significant transactions that will need to be reviewed to determine the manner revenue is recognized, including those from initiation fees and capital assessments, two examples of how revenue recognition can differ based on its classification as a revenue transaction with a customer, an ownership transaction, or a combination of the two.

If the organization determines the initiation fee and any capital assessment is being received from a member in his or her capacity as an owner, such amounts should be recorded as a contribution of capital and would not be in the scope of the ASU. But if it is deemed to be a revenue transaction, it would fall under the scope of the ASU and the organization should apply the five-step recognition model.

Implementation of ASU 2014-09 must occur no later than the annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2017. With the deadline looming, all organizations should be well on their way to assessing how the new ASU will impact accounting for revenue transactions and disclosures, and begin developing a corresponding implementation plan.

Should you have any questions regarding the impact of this standard on your organization’s membership revenue, please reach out to Logan Kowcheck, CPA

You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours

The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at contactSD@schneiderdowns.com.

Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.

© 2019 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

our thoughts on

Audit BY Adam Goode
Reference Rate Reform
Audit BY John Sullivan
FASB Votes to Delay Leases, Hedging and CECL Effective Dates for Private Companies and Certain Other Entities
Audit, IFRS BY Jeremy Ferkatch
Revenue Recognition: GAAP vs. IFRS: What this Means for Your Company
Delay in New FASB Standard Will Impact Financial Services
Audit BY Adam Goode
Proposed Accounting Standard Update Would Delay Private Company Effective Dates for Leases, Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) and Hedging Updates by One Year
IASB Proposes Annual Improvements for 2019

Register to receive our weekly newsletter with our most recent columns and insights.

Have a question? Ask us!

We’d love to hear from you. Drop us a note, and we’ll respond to you as quickly as possible.

Ask us

contact us

Map of Pittsburgh Office
Pittsburgh

One PPG Place, Suite 1700
Pittsburgh, PA 15222

contactsd@schneiderdowns.com
p:412.261.3644     f:412.261.4876

Map of Columbus Office
Columbus

65 East State Street, Suite 2000
Columbus, OH 43215

contactsd@schneiderdowns.com
p:614.621.4060     f:614.621.4062

Map of Washington Office
Washington, D.C.

1660 International Drive, Suite 600
McLean, VA 22102