Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 103 changes how community colleges and similar public higher education institutions present their financial results.
The standard results from GASB’s reexamination of the financial reporting model established in Statements 34 and 35 and is intended to improve clarity and comparability in external financial reporting. For many organizations, this is not a future consideration. GASB 103 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2025, which means it applies to June 30 year-end institutions in their 2026 financial statements.
One of the most significant areas of impact is the Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position (SRECNP). Many public colleges have long followed established practices for classifying operating and nonoperating revenues and expenses. GASB 103 refines that framework and requires organizations to reassess how activity is classified. The objective is not simply to relabel existing line items but to present financial results in a way that more clearly distinguishes core ongoing operations from activity outside those operations.
This distinction is particularly important for community colleges, where funding sources are often blended. Tuition and fees, grants, appropriations, auxiliary activities, support payments and capital-related activity might all exist within the same reporting environment. Under GASB 103, organizations will need to implement a disciplined approach to determining what belongs in operating results versus nonoperating results. That analysis should occur at the account level and transaction-type level, not only at the level of the financial statement line.
Another significant change is the introduction of subsidies as a formal reporting concept. Subsidies, in simple terms, are resources provided to support services or keep charges below cost. This is especially relevant for community colleges, where public support is often central to affordability. The key question under the new model is not whether support exists but how that support should be classified.
One notable change is that federal awards such as Pell Grants will now be reported as operating revenue. GASB was clear that both the related revenue and expense should be presented gross, not net.
The distinction between capital and noncapital subsidies also becomes more important. The Implementation Guide explains that subsidies are considered noncapital unless the provider explicitly restricts the resources for capital asset acquisition. As a result, organizations should carefully review award language, appropriation terms and other funding restrictions rather than relying on broad assumptions. Where restrictions are unclear, it might be necessary to engage directly with the funding agency to ensure proper classification.
GASB 103 also reorganizes the SRECNP to clearly highlight operating income or loss, noncapital subsidies and other nonoperating activity. This change will affect how users read the statement and might also change how management explains annual results to boards, leadership teams and external stakeholders. To ensure comparability, prior-year amounts will need to be restated for these required presentation changes.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) is also affected. The revised model is intended to support a more focused discussion of financial results and the drivers behind year-over-year changes rather than a simple recitation of dollar movements. A leading practice is to develop MD&A insights while responding to audit inquiries, so that the narrative and audit responses align. While not mandatory, GASB also provided additional guidance on MD&A structure, including suggested section headings and clarification on how to address matters relevant to multiple sections.
The key takeaway is that GASB 103 is more than a formatting update. It changes how community colleges and similar organizations tell their financial story. Stay tuned for our GASB 103 Part 2 article, where the focus shifts from what the standard changes are to what organizations should be doing now to implement changes successfully.
About Schneider Downs Higher Education Services
The Schneider Downs Higher Education industry group is a dedicated team of experienced professionals specializing in serving institutions from high schools to universities. Our experience in audit and assurance, tax advisory, technology and data and more allow our professionals to stay ahead of the latest trends, developments and challenges within the education sector and provide timely and practical solutions to our clients.
